UPDATE: August 10, 2022: The public hearing on this proposed development that was scheduled for August 18, 2022 has been cancelled. I expect it will happen at a future date but have no additional information yet.
Rize wants to rezone 113-acres of SITLA land just east of Puerto Drive and south of Mesa Vista Drive to “Resort Mixed Use” (RMU) to build about 550 homes, townhomes, etc., with almost all of them being able to operate as short-term-rentals. (Download their revised Project Plan.)
I am not a fan of short-term-rentals. They may be great for developers and investors, but I do not believe they are beneficial to the community, despite the potential taxes Ivins would receive. It can’t always be all about money.
The public hearing on this issue will be on August 18th. I asked at last night’s City Council meeting to continue the discussion and decision to the September 1st meeting because this issue raises all kinds of concerns for me. But I will be on a ship in the North Sea heading to the Shetland Islands at 12:30am when the meeting starts. It’s our delayed 40th anniversary celebration. I will try to participate by Zoom, but that has not always worked perfectly even when connecting to people locally.
I didn’t get the sense that I would be “accommodated” on my request. So here are my concerns and issues. This is still a short version. I would much prefer having a “real” discussion of issues with the rest of the Council because when we do that, we at least have the opportunity of really understanding each other and all the issues. That is the key ingredient to making the best decisions.
Even if you support some short-term-rental opportunities in Ivins, here are six reasons why I believe they are wrong for this site.
Note: Next week I will post Part 2: Four reasons why I believe the developer’s proposal does not follow our City Code requirements, and Part 3: Nine additional requirements we should add to the developer’s Project Plan to better protect the community if the City Council decides to approve the developer’s plan.
What Type of Tourist Housing Do We Want?
I believe the intent of the 2015 General Plan update was to encourage resort development like the resorts we already had, Red Mountain Resort and Movara. These are “destination resorts.”
A “destination resort” is defined as “an upscale mixed-use community that draws visitors based on superior amenities and on-property activities as opposed to its convenience to other sites or attractions.” In other words, the resort is a destination, not just a place to stay.
Short-Term-Rentals Hurt Affordability
I believe short-term-rentals are wrong for our community because they conflict with the State’s requirement to improve housing affordability. The Univ. of Utah’s Kem Gardner Policy Institute published a report on Short-term-rentals in June.
The first paragraph states, “short-term rental supply leads to a decrease in affordability and housing options as supply is occupied by visitors rather than full-time residents.”
We Should Stick with the Plan
I believe the land use change in 2019 from “Low Density Residential” (LDR) to “Resort Mixed Use” (RMU) did not follow the General Plan and the land use should be changed back to a residential land use.
The Plan is very specific on where tourist accommodations should go, stating on page 25: Coyote Gulch, on Snow Canyon Parkway, Center Street by 200E, and Highway 91.
The Plan says “on” Snow Canyon Parkway, not “in” a residential neighborhood a quarter mile from the Parkway.
When the plan was redone in 2015 to add more focus on resorts, the land use was not changed for this parcel. Because that’s not where the General Plan wanted this type of development. Then we went and changed the land use in 2019, ignoring specific guidance from the General Plan. Oops. The Utah Land Use Institute’s Ground Rules: Your Handbook to Utah Land Use Regulation strongly advises us to follow clear directives from the General Plan (page 46).
When Is Enough Enough?
In 2015 Ivins had 158 units of housing for tourists in three properties: Red Mountain Resort (108), Crescent Moon Inn (10), and Movara (40).
Since then, based on approvals and completions, tourist accommodations have grown to 1,704 units: The RV resort (136+), Movara Villas (20), Sentierre (98), Encanto (30), Black Desert Resort (1,233), and Tuacahn Canyon Suites (29). That total doesn’t even count the 18+ acres in two parcels with short-term-rental overlays by Hwy 91 that could create another 160 units.
In just a few years, we have grown tourist accommodations more than ten-fold, from 158 units to more than 1,700 units. That’s a resounding success at focusing on the General Plan’s “resort” goal. And 1,700 units is very significant since all of Ivins has only about 4,500 residential units.
Let’s Not Lose Focus on What Matters
Goal #4 on p14 in the General Plan states, “Develop Ivins as a resort destination community.” Then it lists seven action steps to accomplish the goal. Only one of the seven talks about building accommodations for tourists.
The other six action steps to develop Ivins as a resort destination community talk about:
- create amenities that all residents can use that make the city more enjoyable to tourists,
- maintain a commitment to the arts,
- encourage activities and businesses that promote health and fitness,
- enhance walking and bike trails,
- expand and support community events,
- develop additional outdoor recreation.
That makes sense. People don’t choose vacation destinations because they have the most hotel rooms.
And those six action steps fit perfectly with Goal #1 in the General Plan: Protect the superior quality of life in Ivins. The action step: Encourage the type of development that enhances the qualities that make living in Ivins desirable. “Living” in Ivins… not “visiting.”
Consider The Implications for Water Use
At the Utah League of Cities and towns mid-year conference, the City Manager of a nearby community told me that water use was most extreme in their tourist housing and steps they have taken to reduce that water consumption have been ineffective. Tourists are on vacation to have fun, and water is fun. I’m guilty of that too when I’m a tourist. Tourists don’t have a personal stake in our community or our water problems.
Please share your comments and tell me about other Ivins issues
I have not addressed in recent posts. CONTACT ME
Recent “Development” posts
- Is This The Right Vision?Does the City’s vision for Ivins’ future match yours? The City Council has been working on an update to our General Plan since February. The General Plan is the City’s primary guiding document, outlining Ivins’ past, present, and future. It is meant to reflect our collective vision, values, and goals. It’s crucial to get this…
- How To Beat The Incomprehensible Web of BureaucracySometimes people get upset on social media about the wrong things. Yes, believe it or not, that’s true. Like when the City approves a “preliminary plan” or a “final plat” for a development. Comments boil down to something like this, “Why would those idiots approve this when we are already overwhelmed with growth, traffic, water…
- Bigfoot And Affordable HousingBoth are elusive creatures that everyone talks about, but few, if any, have seen. Even so, the State Legislature is putting more pressure on cities to find housing affordability solutions. On top of that, the Governor is calling on cities to create 35,000 “starter” homes for first-time home buyers. In response, Mayor Hart created an…
- Developers With Seeger SyndromeDevelopers in Ivins have the Seeger Syndrome. For Pete’s sake, they’re hammering in the morning! They’re hammering in the evening! They’re hammering all over this city! Ivins issued 100 to 150 residential permits a year between 2015 and 2018. Permit activity almost doubled after 2018, peaking in late 2021 at close to 300 permits for…
- We Should Be Seen… But Not Heard!The expression “children should be seen and not heard” is an old English proverb. It wasn’t just a saying. They meant it. Children could be present but should not speak, particularly when they are around adults because children are naive and ignorant of adult matters. My, how times haven’t changed. It sounds like Governor Cox…